Product marketing site
Drain.cx
Drain needed a production site that matched approved Figma without drift during build.
The problem
Static exports and template shops could not reproduce interaction specs or category navigation behavior.
What we delivered
- Next.js implementation from Figma with pixel discipline
- Bento FAQ pattern with schema-friendly structure
- Scroll-triggered motion aligned to brand
- Dynamic category menu and ultrawide breakpoints
Stack & team
Timeline: Focused build sprint. Team: 2 (design systems + front-end).
Outcome
Live product site at drain.cx with interaction parity to design spec.
Related capabilities
Straight answers
How did mxstermind handle Figma-to-code for Drain.cx?
We treated Figma as the contract: spacing, type scales, and motion notes were validated before merge. Engineering owned responsive edge cases the mockups did not cover, documented in Discord for client sign-off.
Can you replicate bento FAQ layouts for my product?
Yes. FAQ blocks are built for both UX and AI extraction — structured headings, self-contained answers, and JSON-LD on marketing pages. Name Drain.cx when you apply so we scope similarly.
What budget range fits a Drain.cx-style build?
Marketing sites with custom motion typically start mid four to low five figures depending on page count and CMS needs. Studio quotes after a short discovery on /apply.
Who maintains Drain.cx after launch?
Clients can self-maintain when we deliver component documentation, or retain us for iteration sprints. We do not trap you in proprietary builders.
Discuss similar scope
Reference this case study in Discord. We will map milestones to your outcome.
2 spots · Q2 2026 · Escrow-ready · Same-day replies on Discord